The
Family development theory views families’ transition overtime. This theory
looks at a specific interest, “the family life cycle”. This theory examines the
family as it relates to its life cycle. The family life cycle it describes,
starts from marriage and ends with the death of one spouse. Though the Duvall’s
life cycle is evident in my family, this is not how most families will be
described. Most families are not so “neatly and cleanly segmented”. Not every
family goes through marriage and divorce and in some families a child may die
first. Yes this theory may be good psychological tools in sustaining marriages
conversely are all marriages worth saving. So, this theory I presume can cause
families to live a fairy tale life. A glaring example is such: I have learnt of
a married couple with children; the man was a homosexual. The wife found out
years after from people who had opened the ‘closet’. She refused to have believed.
One unfaithful night he tried to make love to her in that unnatural manner
which convince her. She was devastated. So, she went to their pastor. What did
the pastor do? He used the family development theory. Do you think this theory
should have being the approach? I strongly believe it should not because it advised
them to continue a family where is conflict of interest and is unhealthy for
social wellbeing. However they did went through the Duvall’s life cycle, all
the children left the home, her husband died by his male lover and now she is
retired from teaching.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.